Weekend Read: Why Markets Are Reacting Favorably to a Trump Presidency
I take pride in personally crafting each of these emails. Unlike many others in the industry who rely on prewritten content, I write these myself from scratch. My goal is to boil down complex concepts and share relevant news in an easy-to-understand format. I hope you find them both informative and enjoyable.
As we discuss the market’s reaction to the recent election, I want to clarify that my aim is not to advocate for any political candidate or take a side. Instead, my goal is to provide insight into what investors might be responding to under a Trump presidency. I hope you won’t misconstrue any discussion of market optimism as a political stance. My focus here is to fulfill what I see as part of my obligation to you, to highlight some of the factors potentially driving investor enthusiasm. This obligation makes it impossible to avoid weighing in on a very charged topic. Please don’t shoot the messenger.
Corporate Tax Cuts and Deregulation
One of the primary areas of optimism lies in Trump’s support for extending his 2017 tax cuts and potentially reducing corporate taxes further1. By easing the tax burden on companies, there is an expectation that businesses will have more resources for reinvestment, growth, and hiring. Lower corporate taxes directly boost net profits, which can lead to higher earnings per share and, in turn, support rising stock valuations. Additionally, a more favorable tax structure could lead companies to repatriate profits held overseas, adding further stimulus to the domestic economy.
Trump’s commitment to regulatory rollback is another positive for markets1. Industries such as energy, finance, and manufacturing could see reduced compliance costs and increased operational flexibility under a Trump administration. For energy companies, in particular, fewer restrictions on fossil fuel production may lead to higher output and profitability, while financial firms may experience more lending opportunities without some of the constraints imposed by tighter regulations.
Both effects tend to support stock growth as companies become more profitable and adaptable. Reducing corporate taxes and regulations can sometimes lead to increased federal deficits, as lower tax revenue might not be fully offset by economic growth. Rising deficits can, in turn, pressure interest rates and increase government borrowing costs, which can dampen long-term economic stability. Additionally, while regulatory rollbacks might spur growth in the short term, they may introduce risks in sectors like energy and finance, where unchecked activities can lead to environmental concerns or financial instability. These potential downsides suggest that while the pro-business approach is attractive to markets, there could be hidden costs that weigh on future growth and stability.
Trade and Manufacturing Policies
Another area of market confidence comes from Trump’s support for domestic manufacturing and trade policy1. By focusing on American-made goods and policies that incentivize reshoring, his administration could strengthen industries like steel, automotive, and technology, potentially creating more domestic jobs and reducing dependency on foreign imports. For companies involved in manufacturing, this policy direction is attractive as it encourages local production and job creation, leading to increased investor confidence.
However, there are potential downsides to consider. Reshoring initiatives often come with higher labor and production costs compared to foreign manufacturing, which could lead to increased prices for consumers and impact profit margins. Additionally, a more aggressive stance on trade could lead to retaliatory tariffs from other countries, potentially hurting U.S. exporters and causing volatility in the markets. These risks highlight that while domestic manufacturing policies can stimulate local growth, they may also introduce new costs and trade tensions that could dampen economic and market performance.
GOP Control: Fast-Track or Gridlock
An important factor in the market’s optimism is the Republican control of the Senate and recently won control of the House of Representative. With Republicans securing both chambers, Trump has a clearer path to advance his economic agenda with minimal resistance. This unified control could expedite pro-business policies like tax cuts, regulatory rollbacks, and infrastructure spending, reducing the uncertainty that often accompanies legislative gridlock. For markets, this smoother legislative path is encouraging, as it suggests Trump’s policies we’ve discussed, may be implemented more swiftly.
However, to provide some perspective, it’s possible that divisions within the Republican Party itself could create challenges in passing legislation. Policy disagreements between conservative and more moderate factions of the party may lead to internal debates that slow the legislative process. Investors may be encouraged by the potential for unified control but should remain mindful that even within one party, achieving consensus is not always straightforward.
Stock Market vs Mainstreet
It’s worth noting that a president’s impact on Wall Street can differ greatly from their impact on Main Street. Policies that might boost corporate profits and stock prices, such as tax cuts or deregulation, don’t always translate to higher wages or job growth and sometimes impact the price of goods and inflation. This divergence highlights that what’s good for the stock market isn’t always the same as what’s best for the broader economy and the people living in it.
Long-Term Perspective for Investors
Making investment decisions based on campaign promises is about as reliable as asking a magic 8-ball for stock tips, lots of “ask again later”. Over time, both Republican and Democratic presidencies have overseen strong markets.
Campaigns are filled with ambitious ideas, but the actual impact on the economy is often limited by political realities, compromises, and unforeseen global events. Market performance depends on countless factors beyond any president’s control, including global economic conditions, technological advancements, and consumer trends. For investors, staying focused on long-term growth and diversification is far more reliable than reacting to the ups and downs of presidential rhetoric.
If you’ve only recently joined my email list, you’ve missed out on many insights and updates that I've been sharing each week. Be sure to visit my blog to explore past content that you might find valuable.
1https://www.donaldjtrump.com/platform
The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Steward Partners or its affiliates. All opinions are subject to change without notice. Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Future investment performance cannot be guaranteed, investment yields will fluctuate with market conditions.
For index definitions click here
Please note that the URL(s) or hyperlink(s) in this material is not to a Steward Partners Investment Solutions, LLC website. It was created, operated and maintained by a different entity. Steward Partners Investment Solutions, LLC is not implying an affiliation, sponsorship, endorsement with/of the third party or that any monitoring is being done by Steward Partners of any information contained within the linked site; nor do we guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Steward Partners is not responsible for the information contained on the third party web site or the use of or inability to use such site.
AdTrax 7284549.1 Exp 11/25